Skip to main content
Cutter Consortium Cutter Consortium
  • Search
  • Login
  • Sign up
  • Practices
    • Leadership
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Industry
  • Products & Services
    • Amplify
    • Research & Analysis
      • Amplify
      • Leadership
      • Sustainability
      • Technology
      • Industry
    • Join the Cutter Community
    • Subscribe to our Newsletters
  • Experts
    • All Experts
    • Leadership Experts
    • Sustainability Experts
    • Technology Experts
    • Industry Experts
  • Arthur D. Little
  • About
    • Corporate Overview
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
    • Write for Cutter
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  • January 2002 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 2

    January 2002

    Resolved
    Traditional methodologists are a bunch of process-dependent stick-in-the-muds who'd rather produce flawless documentation than a working system that meets business needs.

    Rebuttal

    In this issue:
    • January 2002 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 2
    • The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 2: Opening Statement
    • Agile Software Development Joins the "Would-Be" Crowd
    • The Bogus War
    • A Resounding "Yes" to Agile Processes -- But Also to More
    • Agile or Rigorous OO Methodologies: Getting the Best of Both Worlds
    • Big and Agile?
  • December 2001 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1

    December 2001

    Resolved
    Traditional methodologists are a bunch of process-dependent stick-in-the-muds who'd rather produce flawless documentation than a working system that meets business needs.

    Rebuttal

    In this issue:
    • December 2001 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1
    • The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1: Opening Statement
    • Agile Can Scale: Inventing and Reinventing SCRUM in Five Companies
    • Agile Versus Traditional: Make Love, Not War!
    • Business Intelligence Methodologies: Agile with Rigor?
    • Agility with the RUP
    • Extreme Requirements Engineering
    • Exclusion, Assumptions, and Misinterpretation: Foes of Collaboration
  • The Fine, Fine Line Between Success and Failure

    December 2001

    As highlighted in this month's issue of Cutter Benchmark Review, the terms "success" and "failure" are not black and white. Unfortunately, IT efforts are often forced into one category or the other without regard as to why they're successful or have failed -- and whether "failure" may have in fact been the best possible outcome. The articles that follow provide some criteria you may want to add to your own when labeling your projects as successful or failed.

    In this issue:
    • The Fine, Fine Line Between Success and Failure
    • The Chaos Report -- Reality Challenged
    • What's Driving Corporate CRM Initiatives? Status and Satisfaction
    • E-Business Brings Alignment
    • E-Business Success Factors
    • Fists Are Flying: Agile Versus Heavy Methodologies
    • E-Business Packages, Tools, and Technologies
  • November 2001 Cutter IT Journal -- BI and CRM: Critical Success Factors for Achieving Customer Intimacy

    November 2001


    Introduction
    Larissa Moss, Guest Editor

    Business Intelligence: Phase 2 of Your CRM Initiative
    Jay Fruin

    In this issue:
    • November 2001 Cutter IT Journal -- BI and CRM: Critical Success Factors for Achieving Customer Intimacy
    • BI and CRM: Critical Success Factors for Achieving Customer Intimacy: Introduction
    • Business Intelligence: Phase 2 of Your CRM Initiative
    • Seven Reasons Why CRM Projects Fail
    • CRM and the Data Risks from Business Complexity
    • Standards for Business Intelligence
    • Meta Data Return on Investment
    • The Art of Smart: Cultivating Customer Loyalty Through E-Learning
  • Budget Blowout -- Strategies Companies Use to Deal with IT

    November 2001

    This edition of Cutter Benchmark Review will focus on the strategies that companies are implementing to get the most value from their IT department. We examine how companies are aligning their IT strategies with their business strategies and how they are structuring their IT departments to achieve this goal. We then look at how project management impacts the bottom line and finish with an overview of how companies who have outsourced IT overseas have fared.

    In this issue:
    • Budget Blowout -- Strategies Companies Use to Deal with IT
    • With Business Strategy -- and Without
    • Facets of Decentralized IT
    • Immature Project Management Practices Lead to Delays and Expense on E-Projects
    • Managing Offshore Outsourcing

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • 81
  • Next page

Subscribe to free newsletters

Cutter connects the brightest minds from every field, creating unparalleled collective intelligence and transforming what’s possible.

Subscribe

Contact us

  • Cutter Consortium,
    an Arthur D. Little community
  • 10 High Street, Suite 900
    Boston, MA 02110 USA
    +1 (781) 648-8700
    service@cutter.com

Cutter | An Arthur D Little Company

Cutter | An Arthur D Little Company

Copyright © 2025 Arthur D. Little  |   All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
  • Practices
    • Leadership
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Industry
  • Products & Services
    • Amplify
    • Research & Analysis
      • Amplify
      • Leadership
      • Sustainability
      • Technology
      • Industry
    • Join the Cutter Community
    • Subscribe to our Newsletters
  • Experts
    • All Experts
    • Leadership Experts
    • Sustainability Experts
    • Technology Experts
    • Industry Experts
  • Arthur D. Little
  • About
    • Corporate Overview
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
    • Write for Cutter