Business Architecture Framework for Digitizing Business
Business architecture provides a holistic business perspective of a business ecosystem based on a clearly defined, time-tested framework. The business architecture framework shown in Figure 1 was adapted from A Guide to the Business Architecture Body of Knowledge® (BIZBOK® Guide) and represents core and extended business architecture domains. Core business architecture domains include capabilities, value streams, information, and organization. The extended view of business architecture, also shown in Figure 1, includes strategies and policies that drive actions and investments, external and internal stakeholders that receive and participate in value delivery, the products and services a business delivers, the initiatives in which a business invests, and the metrics that enable business performance management.
Figure 1 — The business architecture framework.
As seen in Figure 1, these business architecture perspectives are formalized in a centrally defined knowledge base, a rich repository of cross-functional business knowledge, represented by the business architecture. A given program, planning team, executive, manager, or business analyst can selectively and systematically view this information based on the business scenario or scenarios in play. Digital transformation is one such scenario, but as with most scenarios, it does not stand alone.
For example, one can hardly consider digital transformation in the absence of customer experience. Fortunately, business architecture is scenario-independent, which means that a centralized business knowledge base applicable to digital transformation would similarly benefit customer experience, mergers, investment analysis, and a cross-section of other scenarios. This single source of business knowledge enables digital transformation efforts to align goals, deliverables, and investments with other initiatives, ensuring that digitization concepts infiltrate a business as a whole.
Figure 2 shows the business architecture framework against the backdrop of the business operating model. It is important to differentiate between the business architecture, which is value-oriented and capability-centric, and the operating model. The operating model is defined as “an abstract representation of how an organization operates across a range of domains in order to accomplish its function.” The operating model is more specific as to how things are done, oftentimes represented by business processes and technology-oriented perspectives. The operating model can also include alternative perspectives such as event and decision models that represent how work is done.
Figure 2 — Business architecture’s connection to the business operating model.
The operating model concepts shown against the Figure 2 backdrop are not intended to represent an all-inclusive set of disciplines, but rather to identify high-profile examples found in most organizations. When formally linked to the business operating model, business architecture enables business planning and transformation regardless of operational representations and deployed technologies.
For example, business architecture provides insights into where various capabilities are automated, how well they are automated, where they are redundantly automated, and where no automation may exist at all. This is possible because capabilities define what a business does, not how it is done. Capabilities are consistent, nonredundant, reusable, and largely immune to changes in operational deployment approaches and technologies. If a business leverages business architecture to target a series of process improvements, the capability map can reflect these improvements through heat mapping and related metric adjustments. The capabilities themselves, however, remain constant, providing a baseline for business transformation, including pinpointing required changes to a business operating model.
Figure 3 represents a specialization of the business architecture framework against the backdrop of what may be termed “continuous digital transformation.” The use of this term reflects a philosophy in which digital transformation is not simply a single initiative, but an adopted philosophy that permeates every planning effort, program, and investment. Business architecture provides the holistic foundation to ensure that digital transformation is considered for every applicable aspect of stakeholder value delivery and business capability across the business ecosystem.
Figure 3 — The business architecture framework and continuous digital transformation.
The Figure 3 framework places digital transformation in a business perspective that incorporates strategy definition, through initiative delivery, framed by capabilities, value streams, information, and organization perspectives.
[For more from the author on this topic, see "Leveraging Business Architecture to Digitize Business."]
More: Articles Like This
- Achieving Information Superiority: A Framework to Measure Business Operating Model Performance
- Leveraging Business Architecture to Digitize Business
- To Map Alignment, Get Your Business-Capability Ducks in a Row
- Improve Customer Experience — Leverage Your Digital Data Streams
- Improve Customer Experience — Leverage Your Digital Data Streams
This issue focuses on key topics of interest for financial services organizations, namely equity crowdfunding, legacy systems migration, robo-advisors, test outsourcing, and refining the reconciliation process.
This Advisor presents an overview of improving Agile techniques and practices by using design thinking within the Agile space and describes three techniques from design thinking methodologies that tend to yield benefits to Agile practitioners.
The existence of a digital backbone in an organization means that anyone aspiring and planning to transform different parts of the enterprise can leverage the digital backbone in a consistent and sustainable way, ensuring that each transformation effort connects and leverages a common platform. Digital transformation leaders are starting to realize that a powerful digital services backbone to facilitate rapid innovation and responsiveness is key to successfully executing on a digital strategy.
Can a method like EVM, developed to control projects with well-defined objectives, be applied to control product development initiatives that evolve continuously toward a “moving target”? In an Agile environment, we are faced with the dynamic evolution of a finite boundary of integrated scope, cost, time, and resources; this finiteness — essential for business management and decisions — is the cradle for project management techniques, tools, methods, and frameworks. The EVM method was first developed to help with managing complex R&D projects mostly characterized by an unstable, volatile, and evolving scope. It is therefore no surprise that EVM applies to Agile projects.
It’s a pleasure for me to introduce the first of two special issues of Cutter Business Technology Journal (CBTJ) showcasing the thought leadership and cutting-edge research and development (R&D) being done in State Street Corporation’s Advanced Technology Centres in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific (APAC), in partnership with University College Cork (UCC) and Zhejiang University (ZJU), respectively. The articles in this issue represent a small sample of the output from the R&D undertaken in these centers, which combine academic excellence with real industry impact.
Every business must deal with crisis, risk, and compliance challenges. Teams chartered with addressing these challenges are often split across business units and regions, which fragments crisis, risk, and compliance management efforts. Business unit silos and related complexities obscure ecosystem transparency, which in turn constrain an organization’s ability to identify risks, assure compliance, and prevent and disarm crises. Business architecture delivers business ecosystem transparency as a basis for improving a business’s ability to collectively address challenges related to crisis, risk, and compliance.
Organizations are using blockchain to create new business models — exploiting its capabilities for optimizing contract management, financial transaction management, and identity management.
For technology-dependent products, companies, institutions, and even societies, sustainability depends on learning how to manage technical debt. Like most transformations, incorporating new practices into our organizations will likely be an iterative process. We already recognize the problem, and researchers are making progress, albeit mostly on technical issues. This Executive Update proposes a policy-centered approach to the problem. It begins with a principle that can serve as a guide for constructing technical debt management policy, and then shows how to apply that principle to develop nine recommendations that enable organizations to manage technical debt effectively.
Agile methodologies, however popular they are, bring their own sets of “smells” and anti-patterns to the table, sometimes causing irreparable damage to the team. While the sources of these smells are many, one of the primary culprits is the mindset that treats Agile as “yet another methodology,” totally ignoring the cultural aspect. This article throws light on some of the prominent smells that are emerging of late in the Agile world.
If you start changing an organization toward an Agile mindset, there’s no real end. Agile is about creating an organization of continuous learning and the transformation is done when there is nothing new to learn, which will probably be never. This puts an enormous challenge on middle management.
The articles in this issue present perspectives and ideas on business transformation in the digital age. We hope they will inspire and encourage you to visualize the likely future of business in your domain and to explore the opportunities it presents. Finally, we hope their insights will help you identify suitable transformation strategies and plans and, if needed, choose viable collaboration models for partnering with startups and other firms in your digital business efforts.
Beyond buzzwords, what we are seeing is a seismic shift in the role of technology in organizations. Technology is more and more embedded in everything we do as we move into an increasingly hyper-connected digital world, a world in which technology is driving significant social, organizational, and industry change.
In this on-demand webinar, you'll discover the strategic and tactical opportunities made possible by Digital Data Streams and the opportunities for improved customer experience made possible by DDS.
At the Cutter Digital Transformation & Innovation Bootcamp, Cutter Fellow and Harvard Business School Professor Karim Lakhani talked about digitally-driven disruption of traditional business models for value creation and capture, discussing platform models like Facebook and Twitter. To date, Twitter has clearly done a good job “creating value.” But unlike Facebook, it continues to struggle with the capture part of the equation.
Social collaboration is not about technology. It’s about connecting people, and it’s changing the way business is being conducted. Similarly, gamification is not about games. It’s about motivating the personal and professional behaviors that drive business value. Together, social collaboration and gamification help companies reap great benefits — among them, the ability to deepen customer relationships, drive operational efficiencies, and optimize their workforce.
Roadmaps have two key functions in strategy planning. The first is to outline planned architectural changes that will deliver the required strategies; the second is to outline alternative ways to achieve the same results.
Just as recent global events have given us reason to pause and reflect, the pace of technology emergence and disruption is proving to be a source of inspiration and uncertainty. Transitioning to a digital world is front-of-mind for many business executives, yet finding the right path is an ongoing challenge. So we asked Cutter’s team of experts for their insights on some of the technologies, trends, and strategies that will be relevant in 2017 and beyond. In typical Cutter Business Technology Journal fashion, our call produced a wide range of opinions and reflections worthy of consideration as you chart your business technology journey for the new year.
Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is currently emerging as an area where recent developments are likely to have a major impact on the way organizations do business, societies organize themselves, and even on how we address values and ethics.
The fact is that AGI already exists in our daily life. A common example is the GPS systems present in many new cars manufactured today; and let’s not forget the drones being used to deliver pizzas and cars that drive themselves. While automatic pilots have been used in commercial planes for quite some time, what AGI is about to offer to general business and human activity is well beyond what most of us have seen so far.
2017 is going to be a year of strange winners, and perhaps the strangest of all will be a giant leap away from technology and back to solutions that don’t rely on 24/7 connectivity. With the onslaught of major hacks and Facebook embarrassment, the antitech crowd may have its best year in decades.
One of the most prevalent blockchains in the world, Ethereum, is poised to switch from a proof-of-work (POW) algorithm to a proof-of-stake (POS) algorithm, likely in 2017, with the release of the Casper codebase. Why does this matter? Because blockchain technology is becoming increasingly relevant and prevalent in businesses across the globe. It holds great potential to disrupt how businesses perform basic transactions, from payments, to programmable, self-executing contracts, to identity verification.