FinTech Startups vs. Banks in 2016: Competition or Cooperation?
While the rise of financial technology companies and services has been gradual and steady over the years, beginning perhaps with the founding of PayPal in 1998, there’s been a particularly explosive boom in this sector just in the past couple years, with a new FinTech startup sprouting up nearly every week and disrupting the financial game in a major way. Indeed, companies like Stripe, Intuit’s Mint, Payoneer, and even such developments as Apple Pay are offering an array of fundamental changes in the many ways consumers and small businesses interact with their finances.
These disruptions, whether they be simpler peer-to-peer electronic money transfer services or infrastructures to allow companies to integrate payment platforms on their websites without the need for a merchant account, come at a time when it’s more difficult than ever to qualify for a mortgage or take out a personal loan. In the wake of post-2008 regulatory clampdowns and banks tightening their purse strings, new companies like Lending Club, a peer-to-peer crowdsourced marketplace for borrowers and lenders, are taking major steps to get some skin in a game that has, until now, been completely monopolized by banks.
The banks are taking notice in the midst of all this disruption. Many major players in the financial world are calling for increased regulation of FinTech startups, citing relative freedom in the FinTech world compared to the highly regulated marketplace in which banks have traditionally worked. Naturally, governments and regulatory agencies have become involved, but not necessarily always on the side of the banks. Some top-notch business consultants (Toptal’s acquisition of Skillbridge is something to watch out for in this space) in the financial world have “defected” to the FinTech realm. Additionally, some government regulatory bodies are going so far as to open up banks’ growth processes and value chains and decrease regulation for startups in order to allow FinTech companies to compete with financial giants. These trends suggest that increasing competition, or at least communication, between banks and FinTech will result in a mutually beneficial relationship.
The question then becomes, what is the nature of the relationship between banks and FinTech startups in 2016? Is it one of competition or cooperation? Are the banks in trouble, or are they too powerful to be toppled by these new companies with much fewer resources at their disposal?
One thing that is clear about the current market is that FinTech startups could not exist without banks. Since the vast majority of consumers use banks to store their money, almost all services currently offered by FinTech companies rely on financial information about users that only the banks have access to. Many FinTech companies, however, have cutting-edge technology that banks don’t have (e.g., algorithms to read and identify types of purchases in order to automatically generate a monthly budget), and this competitive advantage keeps them in the game. In the current climate, then, it seems that there’s much more of a give-and-take relationship between FinTech and banks; one that both institutions would be wise to capitalize upon.
Should the banks decide to leverage their competitive advantage (namely, access to consumers’ financial information) against FinTech startups, it could mean big trouble for these new companies, which lack the resources or household name recognition to seriously compete without this information. This leveraging would, however, require a pretty serious investment of time and resources on the banks’ part and might facilitate a major overhaul in the way banks have traditionally operated.
This is where FinTech comes in. It’s no secret that FinTech startups are often on the cutting edge of new ways to utilize consumers’ financial information. There’s a reason these startups are proving to be such a disruptive force in the financial sector, and it’s mainly because they have found ways to analyze users’ information in a way that provides crucial insight that consumers can use for their own financial planning and decision making. Data analytics is the number one driver of financial innovation, and startups more so than banks have been on the cutting edge of using cloud-based data services to provide more personal financial insight than ever.
With this understanding of the relationship between FinTech and banking institutions, perhaps it makes sense to refocus the perspective as we look forward to the industry’s progression in 2016. Maybe disruption and competition aren’t the correct terms and instead we can view it as a relationship of competitive cooperation. The proliferation of FinTech startups will only continue so long as these companies have access to information that the banks hold (or until they gain that access themselves and become household names as big as banks), while banks will continue to rely on FinTech startups to supplement their own offerings and provide the technological innovation to move the industry forward.
More: Articles Like This
- Fire Alarm in Financial Services: The Regulatory Landscape for Cloud and Outsourcing
- Cognitive Technologies in Banking and Finance, Part I
- Cognitive Technologies in Banking and Finance, Part II
- Blockchains and the IoT: Realizing the Economic Potential
- MobilePay by Danske Bank: A Disruptive Mobile Payment Platform (Executive Summary)
This issue focuses on key topics of interest for financial services organizations, namely equity crowdfunding, legacy systems migration, robo-advisors, test outsourcing, and refining the reconciliation process.
This Advisor presents an overview of improving Agile techniques and practices by using design thinking within the Agile space and describes three techniques from design thinking methodologies that tend to yield benefits to Agile practitioners.
The existence of a digital backbone in an organization means that anyone aspiring and planning to transform different parts of the enterprise can leverage the digital backbone in a consistent and sustainable way, ensuring that each transformation effort connects and leverages a common platform. Digital transformation leaders are starting to realize that a powerful digital services backbone to facilitate rapid innovation and responsiveness is key to successfully executing on a digital strategy.
Can a method like EVM, developed to control projects with well-defined objectives, be applied to control product development initiatives that evolve continuously toward a “moving target”? In an Agile environment, we are faced with the dynamic evolution of a finite boundary of integrated scope, cost, time, and resources; this finiteness — essential for business management and decisions — is the cradle for project management techniques, tools, methods, and frameworks. The EVM method was first developed to help with managing complex R&D projects mostly characterized by an unstable, volatile, and evolving scope. It is therefore no surprise that EVM applies to Agile projects.
It’s a pleasure for me to introduce the first of two special issues of Cutter Business Technology Journal (CBTJ) showcasing the thought leadership and cutting-edge research and development (R&D) being done in State Street Corporation’s Advanced Technology Centres in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific (APAC), in partnership with University College Cork (UCC) and Zhejiang University (ZJU), respectively. The articles in this issue represent a small sample of the output from the R&D undertaken in these centers, which combine academic excellence with real industry impact.
Every business must deal with crisis, risk, and compliance challenges. Teams chartered with addressing these challenges are often split across business units and regions, which fragments crisis, risk, and compliance management efforts. Business unit silos and related complexities obscure ecosystem transparency, which in turn constrain an organization’s ability to identify risks, assure compliance, and prevent and disarm crises. Business architecture delivers business ecosystem transparency as a basis for improving a business’s ability to collectively address challenges related to crisis, risk, and compliance.
Organizations are using blockchain to create new business models — exploiting its capabilities for optimizing contract management, financial transaction management, and identity management.
For technology-dependent products, companies, institutions, and even societies, sustainability depends on learning how to manage technical debt. Like most transformations, incorporating new practices into our organizations will likely be an iterative process. We already recognize the problem, and researchers are making progress, albeit mostly on technical issues. This Executive Update proposes a policy-centered approach to the problem. It begins with a principle that can serve as a guide for constructing technical debt management policy, and then shows how to apply that principle to develop nine recommendations that enable organizations to manage technical debt effectively.
Agile methodologies, however popular they are, bring their own sets of “smells” and anti-patterns to the table, sometimes causing irreparable damage to the team. While the sources of these smells are many, one of the primary culprits is the mindset that treats Agile as “yet another methodology,” totally ignoring the cultural aspect. This article throws light on some of the prominent smells that are emerging of late in the Agile world.
If you start changing an organization toward an Agile mindset, there’s no real end. Agile is about creating an organization of continuous learning and the transformation is done when there is nothing new to learn, which will probably be never. This puts an enormous challenge on middle management.
The articles in this issue present perspectives and ideas on business transformation in the digital age. We hope they will inspire and encourage you to visualize the likely future of business in your domain and to explore the opportunities it presents. Finally, we hope their insights will help you identify suitable transformation strategies and plans and, if needed, choose viable collaboration models for partnering with startups and other firms in your digital business efforts.
Beyond buzzwords, what we are seeing is a seismic shift in the role of technology in organizations. Technology is more and more embedded in everything we do as we move into an increasingly hyper-connected digital world, a world in which technology is driving significant social, organizational, and industry change.
In this on-demand webinar, you'll discover the strategic and tactical opportunities made possible by Digital Data Streams and the opportunities for improved customer experience made possible by DDS.
At the Cutter Digital Transformation & Innovation Bootcamp, Cutter Fellow and Harvard Business School Professor Karim Lakhani talked about digitally-driven disruption of traditional business models for value creation and capture, discussing platform models like Facebook and Twitter. To date, Twitter has clearly done a good job “creating value.” But unlike Facebook, it continues to struggle with the capture part of the equation.
Social collaboration is not about technology. It’s about connecting people, and it’s changing the way business is being conducted. Similarly, gamification is not about games. It’s about motivating the personal and professional behaviors that drive business value. Together, social collaboration and gamification help companies reap great benefits — among them, the ability to deepen customer relationships, drive operational efficiencies, and optimize their workforce.
Roadmaps have two key functions in strategy planning. The first is to outline planned architectural changes that will deliver the required strategies; the second is to outline alternative ways to achieve the same results.
Just as recent global events have given us reason to pause and reflect, the pace of technology emergence and disruption is proving to be a source of inspiration and uncertainty. Transitioning to a digital world is front-of-mind for many business executives, yet finding the right path is an ongoing challenge. So we asked Cutter’s team of experts for their insights on some of the technologies, trends, and strategies that will be relevant in 2017 and beyond. In typical Cutter Business Technology Journal fashion, our call produced a wide range of opinions and reflections worthy of consideration as you chart your business technology journey for the new year.
Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is currently emerging as an area where recent developments are likely to have a major impact on the way organizations do business, societies organize themselves, and even on how we address values and ethics.
The fact is that AGI already exists in our daily life. A common example is the GPS systems present in many new cars manufactured today; and let’s not forget the drones being used to deliver pizzas and cars that drive themselves. While automatic pilots have been used in commercial planes for quite some time, what AGI is about to offer to general business and human activity is well beyond what most of us have seen so far.
2017 is going to be a year of strange winners, and perhaps the strangest of all will be a giant leap away from technology and back to solutions that don’t rely on 24/7 connectivity. With the onslaught of major hacks and Facebook embarrassment, the antitech crowd may have its best year in decades.
One of the most prevalent blockchains in the world, Ethereum, is poised to switch from a proof-of-work (POW) algorithm to a proof-of-stake (POS) algorithm, likely in 2017, with the release of the Casper codebase. Why does this matter? Because blockchain technology is becoming increasingly relevant and prevalent in businesses across the globe. It holds great potential to disrupt how businesses perform basic transactions, from payments, to programmable, self-executing contracts, to identity verification.