Expert Guidance to Ensure Agility & Top-notch Systems & Software
Make your software, systems, and software organization a source of sustainable competitive advantage in an era characterized by constant change. Cutter’s community of international experts provides a steady stream of alerts, updates, reports, and virtual events to keep your teams on the cutting edge of new developments in software engineering excellence, product management, and enterprise agility.
The impact that providing a capability catalog and roadmap for the portfolio would have on Agile leaders is significant. Linking this portfolio catalog and roadmap to other efforts and capabilities across the enterprise ensures that there is continued alignment to the enterprise’s strategic direction and that teams are not recreating redundant capabilities but rather leveraging and reusing current capabilities in new, innovative ways.
It is evident that traditional process- and workflow-oriented leadership styles are not enough to make organizations successful in their digital transformation journey. Digital leaders should have an entrepreneurial mindset, believe in collaboration, and exhibit the qualities of an adventurer. Below are the key differentiating qualities that digital leadership should have to carry out digital transformation and operations successfully.
This Executive Update describes six leadership strategies essential to successful Lean-Agile transformation, together with one bonus strategy (the “+1”). All seven strategies describe patterns observed across a range of organizations in the public and private sectors. They and their accompanying pitfalls highlight the need for a number of specific leadership behaviors.
In this Executive Update, we examine how three different IT groups used data virtualization for purposes other than supporting user queries to deliver significant benefits to their organizations.
One major obstacle to business agility and innovation is technology debt (TD). TD obstacles manifest themselves as non-IT executives complain that “we can’t launch this new product/service as our IT systems will not allow us to.” From an IT standpoint, the inability of existing IT systems to support the proposed new product/service launch is a result of past technology “workarounds” that were implemented to meet an accelerated timeline or reduced budget.
With the rush to new digital platforms, technology leaders often underestimate the value of continuous improvement. Many see it as a waste to invest in “fixing the old,” as it would leave fewer resources to develop “the new.” DevOps practices and cloud platforms can catapult enterprise technology forward, improving consumer responsiveness, time to market, throughput, and resilience, but they depend on continuous improvement to become internalized and self-sustaining.
To ensure that the focus of any analysis of technical debt includes the real causes of technical debt, we must define it in terms that are unbiased relative to cause. One approach that meets this constraint is a definition not in terms of cause, but in terms of consequence.
Attempting more demanding endeavors requires innovative methods for delivering, guiding, and managing projects. Meanwhile, the rise in complexity and uncertainty demands new ways of thinking about projects.